Fortunately, it was backward compatible, i.e. I didn’t have to remap any fields. However, the schema was renamed, as it actually had the version number in the web service name. So how does one do this in BizTalk?
In this case, I’m sure there are many paths to the same destination, but here are the steps I followed.
1. I opened a new temporary Visual Studio BizTalk project and consumed the new web service (using the “Add Generated Items” / “Consume WCF Service”). The reason I did it in a separate new project is that it creates the dummy orchestration, and the binding files.
2. I then copied the 2 or 3 schema files to my actual project.
3. I checked my map out (from source control), and opened it in NotePad++ and had to do one small surgery. I had to find Reference Location=”..\WebServices\PlaceOrder_V3.xsd” and replace it with “..\WebServices\PlaceOrder_V4.xsd”. I could have tried it in map, but I’ve seen too many cases where you lose all your mappings, so I did it this way. I then opened the map to verify, and all looked good there.
I then removed the old web service schema, and did a Rebuild, just to see what would happen, which lead to the next two steps.
4. I had to reassociate my Multi-part Message types. Since the messages were using multi-part message types, they were okay as is. But I had two messages types (one for the web service request, and one for the response) that were “red” and had to change. So I just had to carefully pick the new .xsd name for each. (Could have done this also by editing the .odx file, if done carefully.)
5. If you had promoted (or distinguished fields) on the web service schema, you would have to redo those, and that was the case in this orchestration. Then, a really weird scenario happened. Every expression shape that was using the distinguished fields was getting an error. There was not red squiggly line under the items, just a compile error. Even closing and reopening Visual Studio did not solve it.
In one case, I re-typed the msg.property_name using Intellisense, and that solved the issue. For another shape, I did the same thing and it wouldn’t go away. I took a wild stab at it, and created a new expression shape, cut and pasted the statements from the old shape to the new shape, then it compiled clean. I cannot explain that part at all!
6. I’m about to change the URL in the SendPort now, and start testing. I’ll update if anything else unusual happens. I did not use the binding files created by the “Add Generated Items” in the first step above.
6a. Things went bad during testing, took me way too long, like 2 hours to get it working. I had to deploy to QA environment, because it was easier to test.
6b. One issue I had forgot was that the SOAP Action Headers needed to change (in the General configuration tab of the SendPort), for example:
<Operation Name=”PlaceOrder” Action=”http://mysite.com/webservices/neworder_v3/2013/01/PlaceOrder” />
<Operation Name=”PlaceOrder” Action=”http://mysite.com/webservices/neworder_v4/2015/11/INewOrder/PlaceOrder” />
6c. For some reason, it still didn’t work. I’m checking with the authors of the webservice if they change anything else. To finally get it to work, I had to take the CustomBindings.xml file, and run it on the QA system, then change my orchestration bindings to use the new SendPort.
Filed under: Orchestrations